Blood work
Dr. C said that my numbers were "good." Not
necessarily "great," but good. For posterity's sake, and in case
anyone is an expert in hormone numbers and wants to shed more light on my
results, here are my numbers:
Peak -4: E 180, P .41
Peak -1: E 242.9, P 1.0
Peak +1: E 62.1, P 3.6
Peak +3: E 104.2, P 12.4
Peak +6: E 111.3, P 15.6
Peak +7: E 139.1, P 15.2
Peak +9: E 192.5, P 14.6
This cycle, I had less CM than usual. So I think it's
reasonable to assume that my numbers might be a little better for a more
"normal" month, when there's more CM.
I had irregular bleeding on peak -3 and peak -1. Dr. C said
the numbers don't really help explain that. She did say that the estrogen
decrease from peak -1 to peak +1 was more drastic than normal. Usually it cuts
in half, I guess, and my estrogen went from 242.9 to 62.1, although that was
over 3 days, so maybe the day in between had a normal reading?
Either way, the numbers don't give a strong indication of why
I have mid-cycle bleeding, so that's disappointing.
Next steps
Dr. C had two suggestions for further treatment/diagnosis.
1.
Sonohystogram
From what I gather, this is a procedure where a small balloon
is inserted into the uterus, filled with water so the uterine cavity is
distended, and then the doctor uses sonogram to look at the uterine lining. The
goal for me is to see if there are polyps (again) that could be causing the
irregular bleeding and possibly interfering with conception – or any other
uterine irregularities.
Unlike an HSG, this test doesn't look at your tubes. But
since mine were open last summer, and there's no reason to think they've
closed, that's okay.
A plus is that Dr. C can do sonohystograms in her office,
which makes me feel a lot more comfortable.
Does it hurt?? I wanted to know. She said it's less painful
than an HSG, which I had last summer. I don't know – having a balloon stuck
"up there" doesn't sound that comfortable...has anyone had this done?
Was it worthwhile?
2.
Tamoxifen
Option 2, which I can do at the same time as option 1 if I
want, is start taking the drug tamoxifen. I guess this is a milder form of
Clomid. It elevates FSH levels and so can help ovulation either happen (not a
problem in my case) or be better. Unlike Clomid, it doesn't dry up CM and
there's not a strong chance of twins.
Dr. C admitted that since my numbers are good, there's not a
strong need for drugs like tamoxifen. BUT it couldn't hurt, I guess? I don't
know – I'm hesitant to use hormonal drugs unless there's a really clear
indication that they could be helpful. On the other hand, tamoxifen sounds pretty
mild, so maybe I'll try it for a few cycles and see what happens?
(Other bloggers have commented on the frustrations of the
"let's just try this and see what happens" approach to infertility
treatment. That's kind of what the tamoxifen feels like – maybe it will help,
maybe it won't. Might as well try.)
So that's that. I'd be grateful if anyone has tried either of
these routes and has any advice for me! I'm waiting out my current cycle and
discerning with Mr. M which route to take, or maybe both.
+EcceFiat+
When I thought I was going to have the sonohysterogram, the overwhelming suggestion was just to take some painkillers (aleve, advil, etc) before hand. It certainly doesn't sound fun - but hopefully it will give you some answers.
ReplyDeleteI would only do the Tamoxifen if they are going to monitor your hormone levels to see if it is helping. But that's just me.
Prayers for you as you decide!